Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 05:44
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Which is the worst Bollywood movie you have ever seen and why?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Breast transplanted to replace cancerous one in 'world first' operation - BBC
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Maybe not best, but Sounders are most fitting MLS Club World Cup representative - Sounder at Heart
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How do you feel about Donald Trump signing an executive order that says there are only two genders?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Co-Op Climbing Game Peak Takes Steam by Storm, Reaches Summit of Top Sellers Chart - IGN
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Microsoft Confirms Windows 11 Automatic Deletions: Take Action Now To Protect Yourself - Forbes
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Salmonella outbreak linked to California egg distributor sickens 79 people - NPR